|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 61-68
Influence of thymidylate synthase expression on survival in patients with colorectal cancer
Kinjal K Gajjar, Toral P Kobawala, Trupti I Trivedi, Hemangini H Vora, Nandita R Ghosh
Department of Cancer Biology, The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
|Date of Submission||23-May-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||10-Oct-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Dec-2017|
Dr. Nandita R Ghosh
Department of Cancer Biology, The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, NCH Compound, Asarwa, Ahmedabad - 380 016, Gujarat
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Thymidylate synthase (TS) plays a critical role in nucleotide metabolism and is an important target for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the standard chemotherapeutic drug for treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Aims and Methods: The present study aimed to evaluate TS variable number tandem repeat sequences (VNTR) polymorphism by polymerase chain reaction and TS protein expression by immunohistochemistry and its association with clinicopathological parameters in untreated CRC patients (n = 100). Further, the prognostic and predictive role of TS has been evaluated. Results: For TS VNTR polymorphism, the observed frequencies of 2R/2R, 2R/3R, and 3R/3R genotypes were 22%, 51%, and 27%, respectively. When immunohistochemical localization was studied, cytoplasmic staining for TS was observed in 70% of patients. A significant inverse correlation was noted between TS protein expression and tumor, node, metastasis staging (P = 0.027), Dukes' staging (P = 0.039), and lymph node status (P = 0.012) of CRC patients. However, there was no significant correlation between TS VNTR polymorphism and TS protein expression. On survival analysis, a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) was seen in CRC patients with negative protein expression (P = 0.031). Moreover, the subgroup of CRC patients treated only with surgery also showed a trend of poor OS in patients with negative TS protein expression (P = 0.058). However, neither TS polymorphism nor its protein expression was able to predict relapse-free survival. Conclusion: Negative TS protein expression may be related to unfavorable clinical outcome in CRC patients. However, further studies in a larger set of patients are necessary to better assess TS as a prognostic and predictive marker for 5-FU response in CRC patients.
Keywords: 5-fluorouracil, colorectal cancer, protein expression, thymidylate synthase, variable number tandem repeat polymorphism
|How to cite this article:|
Gajjar KK, Kobawala TP, Trivedi TI, Vora HH, Ghosh NR. Influence of thymidylate synthase expression on survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Adv Med Health Res 2017;4:61-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Gajjar KK, Kobawala TP, Trivedi TI, Vora HH, Ghosh NR. Influence of thymidylate synthase expression on survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Adv Med Health Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 18];4:61-8. Available from: https://www.ijamhrjournal.org/text.asp?2017/4/2/61/221579
| Introduction|| |
Although continued attempts have been made to improve the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, it remains a major health burden with nearly 1.36 million new cases and approximately 694,000 cases of disease-specific mortality worldwide according to GLOBOCAN 2012 estimates. Surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy is considered the standard treatment for CRC patients with high-risk stage II and advanced disease. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the main chemotherapy drug, has been used for single or combination therapy to treat CRC patients in both adjuvant and advanced settings. During the course of disease, approximately 50% of CRC patients develop local recurrence or distant metastasis, and the efficacy of 5-FU differs greatly among these individuals. Therefore, the identification of potential molecular markers involved in the 5-FU activity mechanism is necessary to predict 5-FU efficacy and prognosis in CRC patients.
Since the introduction of 5-FU by Heidelberger et al. in 1957, it has remained the basis of therapeutic regimens used in the treatment of many human malignancies including CRC. Action of 5-FU is primarily mediated through the inhibition of thymidylate synthetase (TS). TS is a key enzyme in folate metabolism catalyzing the conversion of deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP) to deoxythymidine monophosphate (dTMP) and provides the sole de novo source of thymidine, which is necessary for DNA synthesis and repair. When 5-FU enters the cell, it gets converted to the active metabolite 5-fluoro-2-dUMP (5-FdUMP) and forms a stable ternary complex with TS. Due to TS inhibition, DNA synthesis shuts off rapidly triggering apoptosis and other cell death processes., Therefore, TS represents a key target for 5-FU and other fluoropyrimidine-based therapies, and it plays a key role in cancer therapy and probably in the prevention of cancer.
TS gene is polymorphic. In the 5'-terminal regulatory region of TS gene promoter (5'-UTR), a functional polymorphism of the tandemly repeated sequences has been reported by Horie et al. This promoter region contains either triple (TS 3R) or double (TS 2R) repeats of a 28-bp sequence., Three major genotypes exist for TS: (1) homozygous for two tandem repeats (2R/2R); (2) homozygous for three tandem repeats (3R/3R); and (3) heterozygous for both alleles (2R/3R). This polymorphic region of TS gene may alter its gene expression level. TS gene polymorphisms may result in modulation of activity level of enzyme and affect the DNA methylation and synthesis and in turn affect cancer susceptibility. Several studied have reported that TS genes with 3R allele have higher expression activity than those with 2R allele in vitro and in vivo.,, Moreover, the tandem repeat sequences of TS promoter region appear to function as an enhancer of transcription and translation. Thus, TS protein expression has been associated with the length of tandem repeats. Several studies showed that high TS protein expression was associated with decreased 5-FU response and unfavorable outcomes in CRC.,,,, Several reports have suggested that patients having low TS levels showed improved clinical outcome compared to those having high TS levels in prostate cancer, nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and CRC.,, Hence, the evaluation of the TS genotype and protein expression may be useful to select 5-FU therapy for only those patients who have a higher possibility of response. The present study was conducted to explore the potential significance of TS 28 bp variable number tandem repeat sequence (VNTR) polymorphism and TS protein expression in primary CRC patients and to correlate results with established clinicopathological parameters. Further, the prognostic and predictive value of TS VNTR polymorphism and its protein expression have also been evaluated.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A total of 100 treatment-naive patients with histologically confirmed CRC seen at The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India, between 2007 and 2013 were enrolled in this study. Before primary tumor tissue collection, written consent was obtained from the patients who underwent surgery at the department of surgical oncology. The detailed clinical history (age, gender, anatomic site, family history of cancer, habit, histopathological findings, treatment given, appearance of recurrence/metastases, and disease outcome) was noted from the case files maintained at the medical record department of the institute. Pathologic staging was performed according to Modified Dukes classification and TNM classification with the World Health Organization grading System. Primary treatment offered to all patients was surgery or surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The main chemotherapeutic treatment included was 5-FU and leucovorin, oral capecitabine, or in combination with oxaliplatin. The study was approved by the Institutional Review and Ethical committees.
To detect TS VNTR polymorphism, surgically removed colorectal specimens were collected on ice directly from the operation theater and transported to the research laboratory. The viable tumor tissue was selected by a pathologist and divided into two portions. One tumor portion was submitted for routine histopathological evaluation and another tumor portion was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and preserved at −80°C until DNA extraction. Isolation of DNA from the snap-frozen tumor tissue was performed only after receiving the confirmed positive histopathology report for malignancy. For immunohistochemical localization, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue blocks were collected from the pathology department of the institute.
Thymidylate synthase variable number tandem repeat polymorphism by polymerase chain reaction
DNA was extracted from the frozen tumor tissues obtained immediately after the surgery. Approximately, 30–50 mg of tumor tissue was homogenized properly and washed with phosphate-buffered saline, centrifuged, and pellet was dissolved in Tris-Nacl-EDTA buffer (pH-8.0), subsequently followed by proteinase K (100 ng/ml) digestion and overnight incubation at 37°C. DNA was then extracted by phenol–chloroform extraction method. The quantification of extracted DNA samples was performed by agarose gel electrophoresis using Lambda Hind III digest. Furthermore, the purity of the DNA samples was checked spectrophotometrically at 260 and 280 nm. For TS VNTR polymorphism study, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was performed in a total volume of 50 μl using PCR core kit (Qiagen, USA). Primers used for TS amplification were 5'-GTG GCT CCT GCG TTT CCC CC-3' (forward) and 5'-GCT CCG AGC CGG CCA CAG GCA TGG CGC GG-3' (reverse). 0.1 μg of genomic DNA was added per reaction. PCR was performed in a Mastercycler gradient (Eppendorf, Germany) using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 60°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min) and final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The amplified products were electrophoresed on 4% agarose gel. Products at 220 bp (homozygous of double repeat variants 2R/2R), 250 bp (homozygous of triple repeat variants 3R/3R), or 220 and 250 bp (heterozygous of double and triple repeat variants 2R/3R) depending on the TS genotype were obtained.
Thymidylate synthase protein expression by immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect the protein expression in primary tumors of CRC patients. Briefly, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue blocks were cut into 4 μm thick sections using Leica microtome and were mounted on 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-coated glass slides. The immunohistochemical staining was carried out using primary mouse monoclonal TS antibody (1:50 dilution, clone 106, Santa Cruz, USA) and mouse and rabbit specific HRP/DAB (Avidin-Biotin Complex) detection IHC kit from Abcam, as per manufacturer's protocol recommendations. Antigenicity was retrieved by heating the tissue sections in 10 mM trisodium citrate buffer (pH-6.0) solution for 20 min in a pressure cooker before application of the primary antibody. All sections were scored independently by two independent pathologists in a blinded manner. The percentage of positive cells and the staining intensities was separately assessed in primary tumor tissues (N = 100). Modified histoscore (H-score) method was used to combine the percentage of TS expressing cell staining and staining intensity. More specifically, the staining intensity was assessed on a four-point scale from negative (0), weak (1), moderate (2), and strong intensity (3). The extent of the staining was expressed as percentage of positive cells (0%–100%) by 10% intervals. The TS histoscore was calculated by multiplying the intensity level by percentage of positive cells, resulting in a value between 0 and 300. Based on histoscore levels, patients were divided into two groups: patients having negative TS expression (H-score <30) and those having positive TS expression (H-score ≥30). This was done on the basis that the CRC patients with ≤10% TS-positive cells with staining intensity: 0, 1, or 2 or those with weak staining intensity (1) with 0%–20% of positive cells making final histoscore maximum 20 out of 300 were considered to have negative expression for TS, while the rest were considered as having TS-positive expression.
The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 17 (SPSS Inc., USA). Two-tailed Chi-square (χ2) test was used to assess the associations of TS polymorphism and protein expression with clinicopathological parameters; and intercorrelation between TS polymorphism and protein expression. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier estimates, and the survival curves were compared using Log-rank test. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
The patient and tumor characteristics are shown in [Table 1]. The patients were followed up for a minimum period of 3 years or until death within that period. Complete follow-up details were obtained in 75% (75/100) CRC patients and were included for OS analysis. Among these, 9% (7/75) of patients were not included for the RFS analysis as they died due to persistent disease. Therefore, 68/75 CRC patients were included for RFS analysis.
Distribution of thymidylate synthase variable number tandem repeat polymorphism
Three types of genotypes were detected for TS VNTR polymorphism: 2R/2R homozygous at 220 bp, 3R/3R homozygous at 250 bp, and 2R/3R heterozygous at 220/250 bp [Figure 1]. The TS 2R/2R homozygous genotype was observed in 22% (22/100), 3R/3R homozygous genotype in 27% (27/100), and 2R/3R heterozygous genotype in 51% (51/100) of CRC patients.
|Figure 1: Representative pattern of thymidylate synthase genotypes on 4% agarose gel. Lanes 1, 2: 3R/3R genotypes at 250 bp. Lanes 3, 4: 2R/2R genotypes at 220 bp. Lanes 5, 6, 7: 2R/3R genotypes at 220/250 bp. Lane 8: 100 bp ladder|
Click here to view
Incidence of thymidylate synthase protein expression
The localization of TS protein expression was observed within the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells of invasive tumors of colon and rectum. TS-positive protein expression was observed in 70% (70/100) of patients whereas 30% (30/100) of patients showed TS-negative protein expression. Representative pattern of TS protein expression in CRC patients is shown in [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Representative photomicrographs of thymidylate synthase immunostaining in tumor tissue by IHC (×40)|
Click here to view
Correlation of thymidylate synthase with clinicopathological parameters
No significant correlation was observed between TS VNTR polymorphism and any of the clinicopathological parameters. On the other hand, when TS protein expression was correlated with clinicopathological parameters, a significantly higher TS expression was observed in early-stage patients as compared to advanced stage patients (χ2 = 4.905, r = −0.221, P = 0.027) and in Dukes B patients as compared to Dukes C and D patients (χ2 = 5.616, r = −0.207, P = 0.039) [Figure 3]. Moreover, TS protein expression showed a significant inverse correlation with lymph node status of CRC patients (χ2 = 6.332, r = −0.252, P = 0.012) [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: Association of thymidylate synthase protein expression with (a) tumor, node, and metastasis stage (b) Dukes stage and (c) lymph node status|
Click here to view
Intercorrelation between thymidylate synthase variable number tandem repeat polymorphism and TS protein expression
Two-tailed χ2-test revealed that no significant correlation between TS VNTR polymorphism and TS protein expression (χ2 = 2.987, r = +0.026, P = 0.797).
Prognostic evaluation of clinicopathological parameters
Univariate survival analysis showed that none of the clinicopathological parameters emerged as useful prognostic predictors for RFS in CRC patients (n = 68). However, for predicting OS, vascular permeation (Log rank = 8.664, df = 1, P = 0.003) and Dukes stage (Log rank = 19.087, df = 2, P < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors in studied patients (n = 75) [Table 2].
|Table 2: Univariate survival analysis of clinicopathological parameters for overall survival in colorectal cancer patients (n=75)|
Click here to view
Prognostic evaluation of thymidylate synthase variable number tandem repeat Polymorphism and TS protein expression
Univariate survival analysis indicated that TS VNTR polymorphism did not predict RFS (Log rank = 2.864, df = 2, P = 0.239; n = 68) and OS (Log rank = 1.251, df = 2, P = 0.535; n = 75). Likewise, TS protein expression did not significantly predict RFS (Log rank = 0.580, df = 1, P = 0.446), whereas it emerged as the significant prognosticator for OS (Log rank = 4.670, df = 1, P = 0.031) [Figure 4].
|Figure 4: Kaplan–Meier survival curves depicting overall survival in colorectal cancer patients (n = 75). Significantly shorter overall survival observed with negative thymidylate synthase expression as compared to positive thymidylate synthase expression|
Click here to view
Prognostic evaluation of thymidylate synthase in the subgroups of colorectal cancer patients treated with surgery alone and with surgery followed by 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy
In the subgroup of CRC patients treated with surgery alone (n = 12), the Kaplan-Meier univariate survival analysis demonstrated a borderline significant shorter OS in patients having negative TS protein expression as compared to those with positive TS expression (Log rank = 3.582, df = 1, P = 0.058) [Figure 5]. However, TS VNTR polymorphism had no prognostic value in this subgroup of patients. On the other hand, in the subgroup of patients treated with surgery followed by 5-FU-based therapy (n = 61), both TS VNTR polymorphism and protein expression had no prognostic significance.
|Figure 5: Kaplan–Meier survival curves depicting overall survival in the subgroup of colorectal cancer patients treated with surgery alone (n = 12). A borderline significant shorter overall survival observed with negative thymidylate synthase expression as compared to positive thymidylate synthase expression|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
TS is a major enzyme for pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis and DNA damage repair. It might play a vital role in the regulation of the malignant potential of cancer., 5-FU, the standard treatment for CRC, mainly acts by inhibiting the activity of TS enzyme. Data regarding TS expression as prognostic and predictive markers have been controversial. In the current study, the role of TS VNTR polymorphism and protein expression in CRC patients was investigated.
The present study demonstrated the predominance of 2R/3R heterozygous genotype (51%). Consistent with these results, Kristensen et al. found preponderance of 2R/3R genotype in 61% of CRC patients. Contradictorily, the 3R/3R genotype was found in 50% of ALL patients. Hu et al. also observed the prevalence of 3R/3R genotype to be 60% in patients with NSCLC. The variations in genotype frequencies might be due to ethnic and environmental differences.
In this study, cytoplasmic TS protein expression was observed by IHC in 70% of CRC patients. Similarly, Westra et al. demonstrated high TS expression in 86% of primary tumor samples in stage III colon cancer patients. Edler et al. also reported high TS expression in 76% of CRC patients compared to 24% of patients with low TS expression. Moreover, another study in NSCLC showed that TS-positive protein expression was found in 57.4% of patients.
No significant association of TS VNTR polymorphism and clinicopathological parameters was observed in this study. Similar findings were reported by Hu et al. in NSCLC and Takehara et al. in lung cancer., Sulzyc-Bielicka et al. also showed no significant differences between the frequencies of 5'-TSER genotypes and age, sex, Astler-Coller stage, grade, or introduced chemotherapy in CRC patients while a significant association was noted between 5'-TSER polymorphism and tumor location (P = 0.0042). Moreover, Fariña-Sarasqueta et al. demonstrated that TS VNTR polymorphism was significantly associated with T stage (P = 0.05) and age (P = 0.001) in stage III colon cancer patients. This association might identify a role of the TS gene polymorphisms in colon cancer risk.
On the other hand, positive protein expression of TS showed a significant inverse correlation with Dukes stage, TNM stage, and lymph node status in the present study. Such an inverse correlation suggests a probability of getting a better 5-FU response in CRC patients with positive TS expression if treated right at the earlier stage. One study by Johnston et al. reported a significant association of high TS protein levels with more advanced Dukes stage in rectal cancer (P < 0.01). However, Zhao et al. demonstrated that TS protein expression was not related to gender, tumor status, nodal status, pathological stage, histology types, or treatment model in NSCLC patients, but the frequency of TS-positive tumors in patients <60 years was significantly higher than that in patients >60 years. Another study by Westra et al. indicated that low TS protein levels were correlated with only mucinous histology (P = 0.04) in adjuvantly treated stage III colon cancer patients.
Further, the present study demonstrated no significant correlation between TS VNTR polymorphism and protein expression. In concordance with this study, several studies described no association between TS polymorphism and IHC staining of TS in patients with CRC and colon cancer., It might be because the final protein expression is the product of many regulatory changes such as transcription, posttranscriptional regulation, translation, and posttranslational regulation. Hence, the polymorphisms at the gene level resulting in the expression of specific mRNA and the expression of associated proteins are not always linearly proportional because modifications or aberrant changes may occur during these regulatory processes. Contradictory to present results, Boyle et al. showed that TS VNTR genotype was associated with TS protein expression (P = 0.03) in lung cancer. Several studies in CRC patients also demonstrated that as compared to 2R allele, the 3R sequence has greater transcriptional  and translational efficiency. Moreover, TS protein expression was significantly related to TS 5'-UTR genotype (P < 0.05) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
The present study revealed that at the end of 36 months follow-up, TS VNTR polymorphism failed to emerge as one of the prognostic factors for RFS and OS in CRC patients. Concordantly, Stoehlmacher et al. could not find any significant difference in the clinical outcome according to the TS 5'-UTR genotypes in CRC. Similar results were noted by Yim et al. in gastric cancer. In contrast, TS 5'UTR 3R genotype was correlated with better survival in CRC  and higher response to 5-FU-based treatment in metastatic CRC. However, Salgado et al. demonstrated lower response rates in patients having TS 3R genotypes than those with TS 2R/2R homozygous genotypes in CRC. Moreover, the present study failed to show any prognostic significance of TS VNTR polymorphism in both subgroups of patients treated with surgery alone or treated with surgery followed by 5-FU-based therapy.
On the other hand, negative TS protein expression was found to be a significant prognosticator for poor OS but not for RFS. In concordance with this study, Zhao et al. found that TS-negative protein expression significantly correlated to lower OS in NSCLC patients. Another study by Zheng et al. also showed that high TS protein levels significantly correlated to better survival in resected NSCLC patients. Moreover, Cho et al. reported that a high TS expression may be related to a better outcome in gastric cancer patients. Contradictorily, Popat et al. indicated that CRC patients having high levels of TS had adverse OS compared to those with low TS levels. However, Findlay et al. failed to show a relationship of TS immunostaining with survival and response to chemotherapy in CRC patients.
Moreover, in the present study, although not significant, positive TS protein expression was associated with longer OS in the subgroup of CRC patients treated with surgery alone. Whereas, TS expression was having no prognostic value in the group of patients treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Similarly, Karlberg et al. in CRC demonstrated that the subgroup of patients treated with surgery alone showed a prognostic significance while TS expression was having no prognostic value in the entire study group or in the group treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, TS expression in the primary tumor only had a significant prognostic value among patients who were treated with surgery alone and not among the entire patient population including who received adjuvant FU-based chemotherapy in CRC. Several other adjuvant studies in CRC reported that TS protein expression had no prognostic significance in the group of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy which is in accordance with the present results., Allegra et al. showed similar finding in locally advanced colon cancer patients. The primary mechanism of 5-FU resistance has been described as an increase in TS expression. However, positive TS expression showed better outcome in the present study following another theory that, as compared to negative TS expression, positive TS expression might be related to more availability of TS for binding with 5-FU leading to TS inhibition and subsequently better response and survival.
| Conclusion|| |
TS VNTR polymorphism failed to predict clinical significance while negative TS protein expression might be useful to predict poor clinical outcome in CRC patients. However, further studies on a large series of patients are warranted to better understand the role of TS as a prognosticator of survival and predictive marker for 5-FU response in CRC patients.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al.
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-86.
Yang Z, Huang D, Fang L, Feng X, Liu H, Wang L, et al
. Predicting adjuvant chemotherapy outcome by simultaneous analysis of thymidylate synthase expression and p53 nuclear accumulation in colorectal cancer. J Cancer Ther 2015;6:446-54.
Bai W, Wu Y, Zhang P, Xi Y. Correlations between expression levels of thymidylate synthase, thymidine phosphorylase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8:12333-45.
Heidelberger C, Chaudhuri NK, Danneberg P, Mooren D, Griesbach L, Duschinsky R, et al.
Fluorinated pyrimidines, a new class of tumour-inhibitory compounds. Nature 1957;179:663-6.
Lurje G, Manegold PC, Ning Y, Pohl A, Zhang W, Lenz HJ, et al.
Thymidylate synthase gene variations: Predictive and prognostic markers. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:1000-7.
Yu KH, Wang WX, Ding YM, Li H, Wang ZS. Polymorphism of thymidylate synthase gene associated with its protein expression in human colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:617-21.
Gao CM, Ding JH, Li SP, Liu YT, Cao HX, Wu JZ, et al.
Polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase gene and risk of colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:4087-91.
Danenberg PV. Thymidylate synthetase - a target enzyme in cancer chemotherapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1977;473:73-92.
Danenberg PV. Pharmacogenomics of thymidylate synthase in cancer treatment. Front Biosci 2004;9:2484-94.
Kristensen MH, Weidinger M, Bzorek M, Pedersen PL, Mejer J. Correlation between thymidylate synthase gene variants, RNA and protein levels in primary colorectal adenocarcinomas. J Int Med Res 2010;38:484-97.
Ulrich CM, Bigler J, Velicer CM, Greene EA, Farin FM, Potter JD, et al.
Searching expressed sequence tag databases: Discovery and confirmation of a common polymorphism in the thymidylate synthase gene. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:1381-5.
Horie N, Aiba H, Oguro K, Hojo H, Takeishi K. Functional analysis and DNA polymorphism of the tandemly repeated sequences in the 5'-terminal regulatory region of the human gene for thymidylate synthase. Cell Struct Funct 1995;20:191-7.
Pullarkat ST, Stoehlmacher J, Ghaderi V, Xiong YP, Ingles SA, Sherrod A, et al.
Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism determines response and toxicity of 5-FU chemotherapy. Pharmacogenomics J 2001;1:65-70.
Kawakami K, Omura K, Kanehira E, Watanabe Y. Polymorphic tandem repeats in the thymidylate synthase gene is associated with its protein expression in human gastrointestinal cancers. Anticancer Res 1999;19:3249-52.
Kawakami K, Salonga D, Park JM, Danenberg KD, Uetake H, Brabender J, et al.
Different lengths of a polymorphic repeat sequence in the thymidylate synthase gene affect translational efficiency but not its gene expression. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:4096-101.
Johnston PG, Lenz HJ, Leichman CG, Danenberg KD, Allegra CJ, Danenberg PV, et al.
Thymidylate synthase gene and protein expression correlate and are associated with response to 5-fluorouracil in human colorectal and gastric tumors. Cancer Res 1995;55:1407-12.
Lenz HJ, Hayashi K, Salonga D, Danenberg KD, Danenberg PV, Metzger R, et al.
P53 point mutations and thymidylate synthase messenger RNA levels in disseminated colorectal cancer: An analysis of response and survival. Clin Cancer Res 1998;4:1243-50.
Paradiso A, Simone G, Petroni S, Leone B, Vallejo C, Lacava J, et al.
Thymidilate synthase and p53 primary tumour expression as predictive factors for advanced colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2000;82:560-7.
Gonen M, Hummer A, Zervoudakis A, Sullivan D, Fong Y, Banerjee D, et al.
Thymidylate synthase expression in hepatic tumors is a predictor of survival and progression in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:406-12.
Popat S, Matakidou A, Houlston RS. Thymidylate synthase expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:529-36.
Li Y, Mizutani Y, Shiraishi T, Okihara K, Ukimura O, Kawauchi A, et al.
Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase expression in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology 2007;69:988-95.
Miyoshi T, Kondo K, Toba H, Yoshida M, Fujino H, Kenzaki K, et al.
Predictive value of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression in tumor tissue, regarding the efficacy of postoperatively administered UFT (tegafur+uracil) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2007;27:2641-8.
Ciaparrone M, Quirino M, Schinzari G, Zannoni G, Corsi DC, Vecchio FM, et al.
Predictive role of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase expression in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil. Oncology 2006;70:366-77.
Zhao HY, Ma GW, Zou BY, Li M, Lin SX, Zhao LP, et al.
Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients. Onco Targets Ther 2014;7:1301-10.
Nazki FH, Masood A, Banday MA, Bhat A, Ganai BA. Thymidylate synthase enhancer region polymorphism not related to susceptibility to acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Kashmir population. Genet Mol Res 2012;11:906-17.
Hu HB, Kuang L, Zeng XM, Li B, Liu EY, Zhong MZ, et al.
Predictive value of thymidylate synthase expression in gastric cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:261-7.
Westra JL, Hollema H, Schaapveld M, Platteel I, Oien KA, Keith WN, et al.
Predictive value of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase protein expression on survival in adjuvantly treated stage III colon cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1646-53.
Edler D, Kressner U, Ragnhammar P, Johnston PG, Magnusson I, Glimelius B, et al.
Immunohistochemically detected thymidylate synthase in colorectal cancer: An independent prognostic factor of survival. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:488-92.
Takehara A, Kawakami K, Ohta N, Oyama K, Ota Y, Oda M, et al.
Prognostic significance of the polymorphisms in thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene in lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2005;25:4455-61.
Sulzyc-Bielicka V, Bielicki D, Binczak-Kuleta A, Kaczmarczyk M, Pioch W, Machoy-Mokrzynska A, et al.
Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism and survival of colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2013;17:799-806.
Fariña-Sarasqueta A, Gosens MJ, Moerland E, van Lijnschoten I, Lemmens VE, Slooter GD, et al.
TS gene polymorphisms are not good markers of response to 5-FU therapy in stage III colon cancer patients. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2010;33:1-11.
Johnston PG, Fisher ER, Rockette HE, Fisher B, Wolmark N, Drake JC, et al.
The role of thymidylate synthase expression in prognosis and outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2640-7.
Dotor E, Cuatrecases M, Martínez-Iniesta M, Navarro M, Vilardell F, Guinó E, et al.
Tumor thymidylate synthase 1494del6 genotype as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients receiving fluorouracil-based adjuvant treatment. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1603-11.
Gosens MJ, Moerland E, Lemmens VP, Rutten HT, Tan-Go I, van den Brule AJ, et al.
Thymidylate synthase genotyping is more predictive for therapy response than immunohistochemistry in patients with colon cancer. Int J Cancer 2008;123:1941-9.
Boyle TA, Haney J, Montoya R, Merrick D, Camidge DR, Franklin WA. Correlation of thymidylate synthase genotype and protein expression and association with lung cancer survival. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:15 Suppl:e21137.
Dong ZM, Cui YJ, Kuang G, Wang R, Yu FL, Zhang JH, et al.
Polymorphisms of thymidylate synthase gene and correlation of its protein expression to lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ai Zheng 2005;24:1225-9.
Stoehlmacher J, Park DJ, Zhang W, Yang D, Groshen S, Zahedy S, et al.
Amultivariate analysis of genomic polymorphisms: Prediction of clinical outcome to 5-FU/oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in refractory colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2004;91:344-54.
Yim DJ, Kim OJ, An HJ, Kang H, Ahn DH, Hwang SG, et al.
Polymorphisms of thymidylate synthase gene 5'- and 3'-untranslated region and risk of gastric cancer in Koreans. Anticancer Res 2010;30:2325-30.
Jakobsen A, Nielsen JN, Gyldenkerne N, Lindeberg J. Thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism in normal tissue as predictors of fluorouracil sensitivity. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1365-9.
Salgado J, Zabalegui N, Gil C, Monreal I, Rodríguez J, García-Foncillas J, et al.
Polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genes predict response and toxicity to capecitabine-raltitrexed in colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep 2007;17:325-8.
Zheng Z, Li X, Schell MJ, Chen T, Boulware D, Robinson L, et al.
Thymidylate synthase in situ
protein expression and survival in stage I nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Cancer 2008;112:2765-73.
Cho MY, Yi SY, Eom M, Zhang SP, Kim HS, Lee JI, et al
. A high thymidylate synthase expression is related to better outcome for advanced gastric cancer patients treated with 5-FU chemotherapy after curative resection. Korean J Pathol 2006;40:160-4.
Findlay MP, Cunningham D, Morgan G, Clinton S, Hardcastle A, Aherne GW, et al.
Lack of correlation between thymidylate synthase levels in primary colorectal tumours and subsequent response to chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 1997;75:903-9.
Karlberg M, Ohrling K, Edler D, Hallström M, Ullén H, Ragnhammar P, et al.
Prognostic and predictive value of thymidylate synthase expression in primary colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2010;30:645-51.
Ohrling K, Edler D, Hallström M, Ragnhammar P, Blomgren H. Detection of thymidylate synthase expression in lymph node metastases of colorectal cancer can improve the prognostic information. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5628-34.
Popat S, Chen Z, Zhao D, Pan H, Hearle N, Chandler I, et al.
Aprospective, blinded analysis of thymidylate synthase and p53 expression as prognostic markers in the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2006;17:1810-7.
Allegra CJ, Parr AL, Wold LE, Mahoney MR, Sargent DJ, Johnston P, et al.
Investigation of the prognostic and predictive value of thymidylate synthase, p53, and Ki-67 in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1735-43.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
[Table 1], [Table 2]